Medya Hakkında İngilizce Yazı Kompozisyon
Media
Length: 611 words (1.7 double-spaced pages)
Since the effects of the media increased over people, the aim of the media has gone into an alteration. The morals of the media changed and a huge conflict became into existence between the morals in past and now. As all over the world in Turkey, ethics of the media changed after the media bosses have caught it. Media must be objective, impartial, and balanced, but because of the media bosses, it changed its ethics.DEVAMI AŞAĞIDA (www.odevindiryap.com her türlü ödevlerinizde yanınızda..)
The first purpose of media must be objectivity, but media rarely objective while reporting or researching information. Media’s objectivity is filtered and censored by the media owners, advertisers, newsmakers, news sharpers, and the pressure groups. All of the affect media while its doing its job. Media’s job is to inform. Because of the filters of media, it usually uses for propaganda, having profit and power. Many people think media is the most powerful means for propaganda. Lord Beaverbrook (1879-1964), who is owner of the Daily Express and founder of The Sun, and he used his newspaper for entirely for propaganda without taking into consideration of the purposes of media (Watson, 84). Media works same in Turkey as the world. The bosses, who have newspapers and television channels, use them for their propaganda. Moreover, this propaganda works very well because they have power over the people and having amounts of profit owing to media.
Media is mass communication, a connection all over the world that informs, entertains, and influences people. It is powerful because most people talk about what they see on the news. Therefore, we can easily say media primarily control people’s opinion, and beliefs. Due to this, media must do its job impartially. In addition to this, the basic criteria of the media would be always say truth. On the other hand, the anxiety of rating and getting power entails media taking sides. It would seem that the media is using for propaganda and laissez-faire, besides both of them obtains to control the people, and control means power (Watson, 86). This control over the people does not look down on because this control orientates the people as the media barons wishes. Like the example of the Italy. The effects of media can straightforwardly see in Italy. Silvio Berlusconi’s political party, which shaped newly, urge into authority in Italy by the hold up of the Berlusconi’s media empire. By the support of his media empire Berlusconi became prime minister of Italy as in Orson Welles’ classical film Citizen Kane, which is about the dream of political officer, eluded John Foster Kane (Watson, 85). The same as in Italy, in Turkey, Kemal Derviþ became a saver of the economy of the Turkey. In addition, because of the supporting of the media, he explained people as a hero and the people in Turkey trust to him and he has able to put in order the economy.
Media must obtain the balance between the truth and the knowledge. In recent times, if people start casting opinions by following one media source, they would be deficient in the other side of the truth. Different reporters have different opinions. Besides, same knowledge could be different in two different news sources. So if the media cannot balanced the truth and knowledge every people would have different thought about same think, and most of these thought would be same with the reporters who informed the knowledge.
As a conclusion, world is controlled for the most part by the media. People’s opinions shaped with what they heard, or what they read. Media has an important part in society. Because of this, purpose of media must be objectivity, impartiality, and balanced between truth and knowledge.
451 words kelimelik başka bir medya hakkında yazı
The Media
The media has been causing problems and clashes in opinions probably
ever since the television was invented. The media probably started out OK, but
after a while, they started twisting opinions and stories, and taking sides. I
think that the media is going to twist a story to make it more interesting once
too many times, and someone is going to sue them badly for it. I would like to
prove that the media sometimes messes up the truth.
The media sometimes finds a certain person and makes his/her story
sound worse and sadder so that they can get sympathy for that person and then
asks people to send money to help the person out. Not that that is a bad
intention, but it is none of our business. I think that the media should just
publish pictures, and then let you choose who you want to feed.
There is also the possibility that the only reason that big news
companies just need filler for their network, so they go to another country to
find some story on miserable people. If I was in some tribe in Africa or
something I would not want anyone bothering me by putting a camera in my face.
I would want the money to buy food, but if someone over in America just needed
my story for filler, I wouldn’t be too happy.
It should be the tribe’s leader that should have to get the tribe out of
trouble in any way that he could. It is not our business to send them our money
to get food for the people that got themselves into trouble, but I think it
makes people feel good to donate things to needy people. I just think that the
media isn’t telling people the whole story. Maybe the starving people spent all
their money on drugs? I doubt that many people would send their hard earned
cash if they knew that the person was just going to buy more drugs with it.
I think that the media has been messing up stories and opinions, but
I’m sure that they did some good work also. It would be pretty hard to get
every little single fact right, but they shouldn’t change things to make them
sound more interesting. I think that by the media’s mistakes and their twisting
things, they have given many people false impressions or gotten hopes up just
to be broken. If they would just try a little harder, then not as many people
would be upset and the media would get a better reputation, but they still
shouldn’t bug into other people’s business. They have good intentions, but it
just gets them into trouble.